Re: Oppose DRM ! Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>
>> a) That proposal never even made it to first draft. Your link just points
>> to a snapshot of work-in-progress.
>>
>
> Could you clarify this? It looks like the proposal ended up as a published
> Working Group NOTE [1].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/streamproc/
>

Sure, although we're getting off-topic here. The Audio WG decided to pursue
Web Audio instead of MediaStreams Processing, so the current snapshot of
the MediaStreams Processing proposal was published as a Note for archival
purposes and set aside. It was never officially a product of the WG.

Rob
-- 
Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
— whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]

Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 22:34:07 UTC