- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 22:51:06 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
The WG Chairs have decided to proceed with a CfC for the use case document. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0027.html /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:34 PM To: Marcos Caceres Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org; Mathew Marquis; Adrian Bateman Subject: RE: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) > Not sure if we should start a separate CfC for that? I will discus this with my co-chairs to determine what action to take here. Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:28 PM To: Paul Cotton Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org; Mathew Marquis; Adrian Bateman Subject: Re: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) Hi Paul, On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 21:44, Paul Cotton wrote: > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following “The picture element” document: > > http://picture.responsiveimages.org/ > > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Friday Feb 8, this resolution will carry. > > Considerations to note: > > - As a First Public Working Draft, this publication will trigger patent policy review. > > - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on the contents. > > Seems something got lost in communication. We are actually asking to publish two documents. The second one is: http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/ It's just intended to be a note, but outlines the use cases that will hopefully underpin both srcset and <picture>. Not sure if we should start a separate CfC for that? Thanks! -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2013 22:52:02 UTC