- From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:20:59 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-html-admin@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 12:21:27 UTC
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com > wrote: > You can take inspiration from other extension specs: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ExtensionSpecifications > > Thanks! On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 12/12/2012 13:26 , Cameron Jones wrote: > >> Ok, how do i publish it for review? Is a link to the repository from the >> existing proposal sufficient or should i generate and publish a build? >> > > If you use ReSpec (as Travis suggests) and GitHub (as Silvia does) then > you can just put your draft in the gh-pages branch and it'll get published > as http://your-user-id.github.**com/your-repo/<http://your-user-id.github.com/your-repo/>automatically. That's certainly good enough for us. > > Additionally, by using ReSpec you earn the right to bug me about how to > get your spec up and running. > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > Great, that's the process i'll follow! If ReSpec melts my machine i'll be sure to mail you ;) Thanks, Cameron Jones
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 12:21:27 UTC