- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:20:01 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html-admin@w3.org
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, modularity is a good way to introduce big features. But what about > small features? > > I don't think we want to go to the extent of making every single patch an > extension spec. I think the HTML WG should default to accepting upstream changesets—even non-editorial ones. It doesn’t do any good to let the specs diverge just because it’s too much work to have a process for affirmatively accept every change. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 13:20:35 UTC