Hi Leonie,
Here is my summary of how I plan to take into account the group’s comments.
1) The TF proposed we include accessibility as an intended benefit of this API work.
I am not planning to make any change. While we want to ensure accessibility
(which we will do through the liaison) we do not yet know whether there will
be any accessibility benefit from this work, and so I would not be comfortable
claiming up front that there will be. As the work progresses and if we perceive that
there are accessibility benefits, we can add them to the FAQ.
2) The TF proposed a mention of accessibility in the section on card payments,
but it sounds like that was based on a misunderstanding. We are not producing
any demonstrations. Therefore, I propose no change.
3) The TF proposed naming the successor to WAI PF in the dependencies section.
If the new group exists when this charter is approved we will update the current
mention of “WAI PF (and successor)” to the new name; otherwise we will leave
the text as-is.
Cheers,
Ian
--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260 9447