- From: liam <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:49:50 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2015/07/23-html-a11y-minutes.html
text version follows
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
23 Jul 2015
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2015/07/23-html-a11y-irc
Attendees
Present
Janina, liam, Joanmarie_Diggs, paulc, Plh, Judy, JF
Regrets
Chair
Janina
Scribe
liam, janina
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Identify Scribe
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scr
ibe_List
2. [5]Agenda Edits & Additions
3. [6]Bug Triage -- Leonie
4. [7]Canvas 2D Level 1 Progress -- Rich, Mark, Janina,
Paul, PLH
5. [8]Alt Doc Update -- Shane, Liam
6. [9]Transcript Support Update -- John, Chaals, Cynthia
7. [10]Tab Panels Update
8. [11]action items
9. [12]Other Business
* [13]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 23 July 2015
Identify Scribe
[14]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List
[14] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List
<scribe> scribe: liam
<scribe> scribenick: liam
<scribe> scribe: liam
Agenda Edits & Additions
[none]
Bug Triage -- Leonie
[Leoni not here]
Canvas 2D Level 1 Progress -- Rich, Mark, Janina, Paul, PLH
Rich: down to two particular issues
plh made a clarification on a test case, resolved
and he gave me a defect to route to Dominic
plh: I will make some edits to the spec as a consequence
should not effect implementations
JS: still expecting success in going to Rec including hit
regions, a big win for accessibility!
Alt Doc Update -- Shane, Liam
<janina> scribe: janina
liam: Updated doc to review
<liam> [15]https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/
[15] https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/
Liam: Not yet finished, still some coordination to do
... Still examples with errors that need cleanup
... Very much wanting review
... Please leave comments either on github, bugzilla, or email
<liam> high level review of document would be fabulous, the
examples are in flux partly as a result of today's first review
<paulc> Could the document indicate what part of HTML5 the
material will be used to update?
<liam> liam: yes, thank you for pointing that out, good
suggestion, will do.
<paulc> What is the 2nd document you mentioned?
<liam> alt doc currently links to an external page on WAI
Liam: We currently have a 30 page doc describing one attribute.
... I propose to take about 20 of those pages to a "more info"
external doc
... Basic need expressed from a cms developer's comment: "Give
me the basics"
<liam> JS: get the write up right and then figure out the exact
split
<paulc> I just put the HTML of the document into MSFT Word and
it finds a lot of obvious spelling errors. Do you want me to
forward those problems?
<liam> paulc, sure, email to liam@w3.org
<paulc> I will try to find time later today.
<liam> janina: good progress
Transcript Support Update -- John, Chaals, Cynthia
<liam> JS: I think a couple of weeks ago Charles cleaned up his
draft
<liam> comments are welcome - email, bugzilla
<liam> John: yes. Was not looked at during the F2F
<liam> The problem we have is that we haven't narrowed down the
options
<liam> First draft still has the different options
<liam> Intent was to get feedback on what made sense
<liam> JS: We still haven't heard which tech approach the media
folks want
<liam> JF: we did get some feedback at F2F at Microsoft in late
Spring
<liam> so now choice of element/attribute names, and whether
the pattern makes sense
<liam> JS: who is making the decisions?
<liam> JF: we need feedback from browser vendors, from
implementors, in yes we can support it or no, not interested
<liam> JF: when we left Redmond we had one or two things;
Charles brought back some things we kinda rejected but didn't
want to lose
<liam> Maybe a proof of concept in JS
<liam> JS: I'm trying to find that someone, who will [help us
move forward]
<liam> I think our position is we don't care on the mechanism
as long as it will get support
<liam> JF: yes
<paulc> Have you considered taking the proposal to the WICG via
[16]http://discourse.wicg.io/?
[16] http://discourse.wicg.io/?
<liam> paulc: Charles did send an email to the media TF; it has
zero uptake
<liam> Don't want to take too many conclusions from that.
<liam> But I think it's because they are so busy on their
current work on EME
<paulc> Charles email to Media TF:
[17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015
Jul/0003.html
[17]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Jul/0003.html
<liam> So when you [TF] stood in front of Redmond you had a
captive audience
<liam> but they're so busy on MSE and EME that it's not clear
we're going to get a response
<liam> plus not clear whether this should be looked at by MSE
or EME or both
<liam> so the reason I suggested you go to the CG is I think
it's more likely you may get both developer input and browser
input there
<liam> JS: I think that's a very helpful suggestion and
explains why we're not getting feedback
Tab Panels Update
<liam> [Leoni stilll not here]
action items
<liam> JF: [no-one on the call with actions except John's, in
progress]
<JF> [18]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/327
[18] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/327
<liam> PLH: [19]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/327
is done
[19] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/327
close action-327
<trackbot> Closed action-327.
Other Business
<liam> Judy: As we head into August it can be useful to plan
across upcoming weeks and confirm whether we'll have critical
mass to keep moving forward
<paulc> I am workiing for ALL of August.
<liam> JS: next week we have Shane to present on Web payments
<liam> very busy activity & important for a11y
<liam> bringing others to the call to help
<liam> I hope for a brief intro in email from ShaneM
<liam> So i'm incluned to believe we have basis to meet the
next two weeks
<liam> [adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--
Liam Quin, W3C
XML Activity Lead;
Digital publishing; HTML Accessibility
Received on Friday, 24 July 2015 02:49:53 UTC