- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:19:46 +0100
- To: <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
HTML A11y TF, There is an action for someone to take a look at the draft Web Payments WG charter on behalf of the TF. I've read it through and overall think it's positive in terms of accessibility. A couple of notes... In the opening "mission statement" section, the benefits of reducing fragmentation are listed. It would be good for accessibility to be included in this list, perhaps by changing this benefit: "Improved transparency and confidence in digital payments for consumers as a result of increased choice and standardized flows and experiences." To something like: "Improved transparency and confidence in digital payments for consumers as a result of increased choice and standardized flows and accessible experiences." In section 3.2 (Optional deliverables) a card payments recommendation is proposed. In the list of things such a recommendation could achieve, it would be good to mention accessibility. Perhaps by adding the following: "Demonstrate how to present a debit-pull digital payment scheme interface that is accessible and usable by consumers." The last thing is a minor nit, but in section 4.2 (Other W3C groups) It should probably be APA instead of PF listed as the liaison. Léonie. -- Senior accessibility engineer @PacielloGroup @LeonieWatson n
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 08:20:09 UTC