RE: clarification sought on publishing alt text document as a WG note from John Foliot on 2014-10-14 (public-html-a11y@w3.org from October 2014)

From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:17:19 -0700
To: "'Liam R E Quin'" <liam@w3.org>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-id: <079d01cfe7d2$c470a9e0$4d51fda0$@ca>

Liam R E Quin wrote:
>
> Since we had consensus on publishing longdesc I don't see how we could
> have consensus on a document that could be taken as implying (although
> it doesn't say) that one shouldn't use longdesc.


+1

JF

Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:18:23 UTC