- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:12:25 +0100
- To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VntGVUX+KxjgYf2w6O7v+ng5DFXvonvwni9jyAX5n3Q8w@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks to you both for clarification. I am understanding of the context and motivations of the taskforce's decisions and am accepting of future plans for the document. I will of course provide feedback on future changes. Note: I have requested a heartbeat publication of the document in its current form, details as to why outlined in request http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2014Oct/0025.html -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 9 October 2014 19:36, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:06:01 -0700 > "John Foliot" <john@foliot.ca> wrote: > > > Steve Faulkner wrote: > >[...] > > It was not, and was never intended to be, a slight against the document > or you > > as editor Steve - in fact your contributions and effort were again > praised and > > noted on the call, if not captured in the minutes - my bad there. > > +1 -- I also mentioned that I would expect that, in the event of becoming > editor or co-editor, Steve's name would remain on the document in some > form, e.g. "Former Editor" (to avoid confusion and so I get blamed for any > recent errors :-) ). More than one person expressed similar sentiments. > > I think the problem is that the context in which the current draft was > written is not the context today (or in a few weeks from now). It's > possible that a couple of short notes by a couple of the examples and an > additional paragraph explaining the relationship of alt to longdesc 9and, > ideally, title, because I know there's some confusion in that area) would > satisfy my objection; I can't speak for others. > > I should add that I've come into this late; I offered to help out with > editing not in an attempt to remove you or "take over", and initially > declined to be an editor fearing people might get that perception. Rather, > I was asked to work on the boilerplate text (which is for the most part > changing one line with Respec, as with xmlspec) but in doing so saw a wider > context issue that the TF agreed we need to resolve. > > Hope that helps, > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ >
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 12:13:35 UTC