Re: clarification sought on publishing alt text document as a WG note

Sam Ruby writes:
> On 10/08/2014 03:57 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> >The process did not fail. You've simply forgotten the PF componant in
> >the process. Without it, the HTML-WG cannot proceed.
> 
> Point of clarification: this is not a document that is produced jointly with
> PFWG, nor is this document owned by this task force.  See, for example, the
> third bullet in the "Accessibility Task Force" section of "Plan 2014"[1].
> 
> At the current time, the HTML WG chairs are aware of concerns expressed by
> members of the PF, and have decided to give PFWG an opportunity to make a
> proposal on how to proceed.  Any such proposal would need to go to the HTML
> WG.
> 

I suppose it depends on the definition of "responsibility" in that
bullet point? There's a much clearer statement also the list of deliverables in the HTML-A`11Y TF
Work Statement, which was approved by the HTML-WG:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/html-task-force

Janina




> >PS: This is pretty much a standing agendum on the TF call. As always, you are
> >welcome to discuss this with the TF there.
> 
> It also has proven to be a pretty much standing agendum in the HTML WG
> telecon.  In fact, it is on the agenda[2] this week as item 6b.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#a11y-tf
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2014OctDec/0001.html

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair,	Protocols & Formats	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
	Indie UI			http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/

Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 22:10:22 UTC