- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:39:57 +0000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.org>
- Message-ID: <2fe540d5827f480989ea40b151d29e77@BL2PR03MB418.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Where do we stand with closing out the open bugs [1] on this specification so that we get a finalized version to publish as a WG Note?
/paulc
[1] http://tinyurl.com/kf7qdqn
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 1:13 PM
To: David MacDonald
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force; public-html-admin@w3.org; Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby; Mark Sadecki; Janina Sajka
Subject: Re: text alternatives standalone draft
HI Dave, thanks sorry I should have said before, could people file bugs - thanks!
file a bug - https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?comment=&product=HTML%20WG&component=CR%20alt%20techniques%20%28editor%3A%20Steven%20Faulkner%29
--
Regards
SteveF
HTML 5.1<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
On 21 April 2014 15:49, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
Hi Steve
A couple a thoughts...
1) I think screen reader users should be explicitly informed that information below is the alternative... rather than deducing it from the heading above the alternative.
alt="Flowchart: Dealing with a broken lamp.">
I would add "full description below"
alt="Flowchart: Dealing with a broken lamp. Full description below">
========
alt="Bar chart: Average rainfall in millimetres by Country and Season."
Same here
alt="Bar chart: Average rainfall in millimetres by Country and Season. Table of data below"
2) I'm not sure of "more than a couple of sentences" being the guidance for providing a long text alternative. I've always understood it to be if it requires more than about 100 words, OR if there is a necessity to structure it, then a long and structured description should be provided. A couple of sentences means about 20 words. Do we really want people to start requiring a long description if the alt is more than 20 words? Remember, the general public will take this document as the final word... I would like other's thoughts on this.
3) Also I think we need an example of the long description immediately following the image, where it is hidden in an expandable tag such as the Details/Summary (or a JavaScript fallback) .... every developer I know resists long text following an image because they don't want to give up the page real estate.
Cheers,
David MacDonald
CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel: 613.235.4902<tel:613.235.4902>
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.Can-Adapt.com>
Adapting the web to all users
Including those with disabilities
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com<mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com>> wrote:
here is an updated draft of the alt text standalone doc I have been threatening to prepare but not actually delivered on until now.
Its still needs a little work, but is almost ready. This is intended to be published as a note.
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives
W3C Editor's Draft 20 April 2014
http://rawgit.com/w3c/alt-techniques/master/index.html
--
Regards
SteveF
HTML 5.1<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 19:40:33 UTC