- From: Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:54:33 -0400
- To: HTML A11Y TF Public <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hello,
The minutes for the HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 10 July 2014
are available in HTML and plain text below:
HTML:
http://www.w3.org/2014/07/10-html-a11y-minutes.html
TEXT:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
10 Jul 2014
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2014/07/10-html-a11y-irc
Attendees
Present
John_Foliot, Janina, Paul_Cotton, John_Foliot,
Mark_Sadecki, Cynthia_Shelley, Judy, Brewer, Plh, Shane,
McCarron
Regrets
adrian roselli
Chair
Janina
Scribe
MarkS, JB
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Longdesc
2. [5]Announcement from Mark Sadecki
3. [6]Media
4. [7]HTML5.1 (menus from Cynthia Shelley)
* [8]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 10 July 2014
<janina_> Meeting: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference
<MarkS> scribe: MarkS
Longdesc
JS: Status update, we are waiting for some content from chaals.
We are going through the objection we received from Ted
O'Connor that we may treat as a formal objection
... I might be able to take on some of the work since Chaals is
still going through rehabilitation for his knee
... Mark can you help
MS: YEs Janina, I can help.
JS: John, you can help with the research part. Anyone can
actually. we will go through the list of concerns raised by Ted
and list when the TF has reached consensus on those concerns.
... we believe these are all old concerns
... we want to put that kind of response together
... John, i know you have a lot of historical knowledge here as
well.
JF: Its a question of when you need it. I will be heading up to
San Jose for Open Web Camp. Will be unavailable until Monday.
JS: we can touch base on the Media call on Monday
... apologies to Paul for not getting a response on his
question RE the CfC in the TF
Announcement from Mark Sadecki
<Judy> scribe: JB
MS: wanted to let people know that after careful deliberation I
have decided to accept a position at the e-learning startup edX
here in Cambridge, and will no longer be continuing in my role
as Staff Contact for the task force.
...will still be working on accessibility in a field I have pst
experience in; I'm very excited, but regret having to leave my
position here;
...hoping to continue my involvement here at W3C and have
starting conversations with new employer on that
JS: very sorry to hear the news but wish you well in the new
work, and appreciate the help you've given here. appreciate the
approach you've used here that has helped the enviroment of the
TF
MS: have very much enjoyed working with everyone here and have
made great friendships and relationships that I hope to
maintain.
<Judy> scribe: Mark
JB: It's been great having you in this role, Mark. You've done
great work in the TF, but also mapping out accessibility issues
in other parts of the Open Web Platform.
... mixed feeling here as well. Hope you can find some way to
remain involved. Good to have someone working on accessibility
at edX
... because this role is so critical to accessibility in HTML,
we have been carefully considering next steps.
... W3C management is aware of the critical nature of this role
and is looking at interim solutions to maintain the momentum of
this group
... including the active sub groups
... and new canvas task force
... we will have more details very soon.
... if any questions, please email me
PLH: thank you mark, still trying to figure how to prevent you
from leaving, locking your door perhaps
... hope this work can continue since it is of so much
importance.
JS: and we hope that you can maintain involvement after
switching roles
JF: don't be a stranger, dude!
CS: +1
<paulc> +10 from the HTML WG Chairs on Mark's contributions to
the A11Y TF and the Canvas work
SM: I've been involved with W3C for many years and you've been
one of the best team contacts I've ever worked with.
JS: You've made great progress on Canvas for sure.
Media
JB: We have some ideas for who can take over convening the
Media Sub Group
JS: we are moving expeditiously to publish a heartbeat draft.
Incorporating accepted revisions.
... still hoping to get this done by next week
... do we need to run a CfC in the TF to publish this HB
JB: given that the media sub group is a sub group of the TF,
they do not have publishing capabilities. That particular
deliverable is simply under PF, so we would want to follow the
PF process.
... Janina, as the liaison to PF has the ability to do that
... I don't remember this document coming through the TF in
some time, so perhaps there are others who would like a chance
to review
JS: sounds like it would be prudent to run it through the TF
and PF.
... which means we will need a new Team contact to publish the
document
... HTML is not running CfC's on HBs
JB: don't want to cause confusion about how the TF handles such
things
<paulc> Can we have a link to the candidate document?
<paulc> I was dropped off the phone for 2-3 mins.
[9]https://rawgit.com/w3c/pfwg/master/media-accessibility-reqs/
index.html
[9] https://rawgit.com/w3c/pfwg/master/media-accessibility-reqs/index.html
the above is a link to an editors draft which is still in flux
a candidate document should be available early next week
stabilized
JS: no bug triage meeting, lack of quorum. no urgent bugs to
consider
HTML5.1 (menus from Cynthia Shelley)
[10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist
[10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist
JS: date UI discussion would benefit from Chaals who is doing
work in WebApps
CS: Most of the menus that are out there right now, are
hybrids. design pattern called a mega-menu. usually tabbed,
each tab has things that look like headings but are not
... quite a few menus that are more like dialogs than menus, or
are a hybrid
<cyns>
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Ju
l/0023.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Jul/0023.html
CS: mega menus, with examples are in the email. Interestingly,
its not a menu. they usually contain aria menu markup, which is
not correct
... menu footers, similar
... facebook notification center. toolbar (of sorts) menus,
buttons, links, drop downs. some are links, some are
combinations of links and menus
... news.google.com, upper right, account name. hybrid, acts
like a dialog, looks like a menu.
... what designers think of as a menu are not like a menu.
sometimes you can click in one place to activate, the amazon
your account drop down is a good example of this.
... two columns, ability to add to cart
... menus are not at all like traditional OS menus. And aria
may not be able to solve all of these uses.
... designers still call them menus
... there are traditional menus. outlook.com, gmail, have
traditional menus
... context menus, i.e. settings
... aria menu markup doesn't quite meet the need
... what is currently in html5.1 is not as far off as I
remember. there has been work done.
... aria menus, the markup is fine for trad. menus, but for
hybrid menus, it would be tricky. would need techniques and or
more roles
... aria is clear, but building a script based menu is hard.
considering different input modes, speech, touch, etc
... hover doesn't work with touch
... i would like to see menus back in 5.1 what we need is more
than just a file edit menu
... lots of links in the email I sent. Love to hear feedback.
JF: seems to be that the fundamental problem is the difference
between real menus and theys hybrid constructs
... perhpas we need a super class of navigation roles
CS: a lot of these have links, buttons, graphics, objects with
multiple ui things, etc. mini dialogs
JF: sometimes they have two events attached to the same link
even
CS: designers don't see a difference between links and buttons.
they are the same things. they are all things that do stuff
JF: interaction triggers
JS: what we want to address is having sufficient tools and
techniques to accomplish these
... don't think we can fully do this from the accessibility
perspective. what is the interest of the HTML WG in taking this
on
PC: Don't know
JS: once HTML adds specificity, we would need to look at
support from an accessibility perspective
... next step is finding out the wider interest in taking on
something like this.
CS: anyone know devs at chrome?
MS: I can contact dominic
CS: can talk to david bolter
... some of these are accessible, once you figure them out,
just an awkward UE
SM: sounds like we have a today problem. can we do WCAG
techniques for these?
CS: for some of these, perhaps.
... would need a collaborator to accomplish that
... not even sure what a screen reader would do with tab-panel
has-popup
... most are styled links inside a div with a role of menu on
them
... so we need to figure out if HTML WG wants to do anything
with this
... see if ARIA wants to do something with this, perhaps in 1.1
... and WCAG techniques
JS: i think ARIA will not do anything if HTML doesn't want to
be involved
... scope creep for 1.1
CS: I can take an action to find out what HTML wants to do
... we can file an issue in ARIA
... someone needs to take an action to talk with WCAG
JS: I think PF has a liaison, joshue perhaps. can bring it up
with them
JF: we can create the issue, but if we don't have a solution,
might be fruitless exercise
CS: we could definitely improve the situation with WCAG
techniques
... i can create Issues and Action manually
... Issue for ARIA for hybrid menus
... Action for cyns to find out who in HTML to discuss interest
... Issue for WCAG hybrid menu techniques
... Action for me to contact James Nurthen
... anyone think this is *not* an issue?
JF: this is an issue
SM: navigation is one of the biggest issues on the web today
JS: navbar is one of the most frequent complaints I hear
Thanks to Cynthia for a great presentation on ACTION-262
JB: thanks to Paul for already providing comments on MAUR
[adjourned]
<Judy> ...and thanks to Mark for all his work on the TF.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [12]scribe.perl version
1.138 ([13]CVS log)
$Date: 2014-07-10 21:52:34 $
[12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 21:54:35 UTC