W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Bug 13435: Editorial changes to The Video element

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:34:45 +0100
To: lwatson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xbzjj7pry3oazb@chaals.local>
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:03:33 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer  
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW I'm happy with the resolution on that bug, since what Ian stated
> is true: it's already specified.

Yeah, I can live with that. I certainly think that this is a truly  
editorial change request.

On the other hand, my inclination is generally to add mentions of  
accessibility for the removal of doubt. I suspect the editors can come up  
with text that is more compact than the proposal and includes a reminder  
of the fact that accessibility content is important to people.

I would *prefer* that as an outcome.

cheers

Chaals

> Silvia.
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Léonie Watson
> <lwatson@paciellogroup.com> wrote:
>> TF,
>>
>>
>>
>> This bug was filed on behalf of the TF in 2011, and was subsequently  
>> marked
>> as resolved/wontFix.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13435
>>
>>
>>
>> We need to decide whether the resolution is acceptable (so we can close  
>> the
>> bug), or whether we wish to pursue it under 5.1. Comments welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Léonie.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Paciello Group.
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 09:35:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:37 UTC