- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:34:45 +0100
- To: lwatson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:03:33 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW I'm happy with the resolution on that bug, since what Ian stated > is true: it's already specified. Yeah, I can live with that. I certainly think that this is a truly editorial change request. On the other hand, my inclination is generally to add mentions of accessibility for the removal of doubt. I suspect the editors can come up with text that is more compact than the proposal and includes a reminder of the fact that accessibility content is important to people. I would *prefer* that as an outcome. cheers Chaals > Silvia. > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Léonie Watson > <lwatson@paciellogroup.com> wrote: >> TF, >> >> >> >> This bug was filed on behalf of the TF in 2011, and was subsequently >> marked >> as resolved/wontFix. >> >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13435 >> >> >> >> We need to decide whether the resolution is acceptable (so we can close >> the >> bug), or whether we wish to pursue it under 5.1. Comments welcome. >> >> >> >> Léonie. >> >> >> >> >> >> The Paciello Group. > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 09:35:21 UTC