- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:56:13 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13553 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Cynthia Shelly from comment #4) > The text is still there, and is still confusing. In the example, the > following markup is used > <label><input type=checkbox name=lost> Lost</label> > > The <input> is a child of the <label>. The text in the example says that > the input would be activated or focused, depending on platform convention. > <input> is an interactive element, so this contradicts the sentence in the > paragraph above. > > Suggest re-wording to: > The label element's exact default presentation and behavior, in particular > what its activation behavior might be, if anything, should match the > platform's label behavior. The activation behavior of a label element for > events targeted at <del>interactive content</del><ins>hyperlink</ins> > descendants of a label element, and any descendants of those > <del>interactive content</del><ins>hyperlink</ins> descendants, must be to > do nothing. Upon re-reading it does appear confusing, as you point out. How does replacing "interactive content" with "hyperlink" make it any clearer? I am inclined to agree that the meaning is clearer without the second sentence and either remove the second sentence or be more prescriptive about expected behaviour when a label contains mulitiple controls. <label><input type="text"> <input type="text"> test</label> note in the example above clicking on the label causes focus to be placed on the first input in browser i tested (in firefox/IE/chrome on windows) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 11:56:15 UTC