- From: Mark Sadecki <mark.sadecki@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:32:48 -0500
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOego5NjhNFWUUFJjFo1yoyv=eqrPQ3PyGi9Qp36Rvwq6gtXNw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
The minutes for the HTML Accessibility Task Force Media Sub Group
Teleconference 15 December 2014 are available in HTML and plain text below:
HTML:
http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html
<http://www.w3.org/2014/12/08-html-a11y-media-minutes.html>
Text:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
15 Dec 2014
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-irc
Attendees
Present
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
JF, MarkS
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Identify Scribe
2. [5]Media Accessibility User Requirements: Remaining
Comment Responses
3. [6]Finalize Responses to Commenters
4. [7]Finalize MAUR
* [8]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 15 December 2014
<ShaneM> huh - that didnt woprk
<ShaneM> trying again
<JF> Chair+ John Foliot agenda+ Identify Scribe agenda+ Media
Accessibility User Requirements: Remaining Comment Responses
agenda+ Finalize Responses to Commenters agenda+ Finalize MAUR
<JF> Chair + John Foliot
<JF> scribe: JF
Identify Scribe
Media Accessibility User Requirements: Remaining Comment Responses
discussing BBC/Nigel's response to our response:
[9]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Dec
/0035.html
[9]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Dec/0035.html
<MarkS> scribe: MarkS
<ShaneM>
[10]http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/media-accessibility-reqs/#require
ments-on-the-use-of-the-viewport
[10]
http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/media-accessibility-reqs/#requirements-on-the-use-of-the-viewport
SM: RE: [VP-5] perhaps it should be positioned such that,
editorial important content is not obscured.
JF: and what are we saying?
... that sentence is a mouthful. can we whittle this down?
SM: I think we need to do two things. 1. there is a req that
the UA MUST avoid
... then there is a note
... not too concerned about covering all of his points. think
we just need another note about contained environments where
overlap is most likely going to happen.
JF: this is the last comment we have to deal with, right?
SM: yes
JF: once we get this done, we can move this toward formal note
status
SM: need to send responses to commenters
... i have drafts
... we still need to review them (per agenda)
JF: should we note that we are going to take nigel's comment
and work it into the note?
SM: yes
<scribe> ACTION: ShaneM to incorporate nigel's comment
[recorded in
[11]http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html#a
ction01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-293 - Incorporate nigel's comment [on
Shane McCarron - due 2014-12-22].
<ShaneM>
[12]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/MAUR_Comment_Processing
_2
[12] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/MAUR_Comment_Processing_2
Finalize Responses to Commenters
SM: I put the comments into the wiki.
JF: I took a look at this earlier. Think this is sufficient,
especially if we keep this wiki as a record.
SM: I was thinking of actually referencing the wiki.
JF: that works for me
MS: These look great to me
JF: We didn't really reject anything except for that one. And
that is well documented here, so I think this is at the point
that once we update the BBC comment, this is good.
... Probably won't be doing much more before the new year with
the holidays approaching.
SM: I think the moratorium is fast approaching, thursday maybe,
so we have three weeks here.
... if we adjourn early, I can take care of drafting the change
based on Nigel's response now.
Finalize MAUR
SM: make BBC change, draft responses, send responses, publish
JF: so first week of january?
SM: yes, I think that is realistic.
... there may be a bottleneck after moratorium gets lifted.
... liam will probably take care of the formal publication
steps
... I'll mention it to him next time we talk
... propose we do not meet next week.
JF: so when should we meet again?
... glad to not meet on the 29th either. I am out 1/5/2015
SM: I say we meet on the Fifth without JF. should be plenty of
time to review the pub before then.
RESOLUTION: next meeting is January 5th, 2015
[adjourned]
<JF> NOTE: attendees on the phone were Shane, JF and MarkS
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: ShaneM to incorporate nigel's comment [recorded
in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html#a
ction01]
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version
1.140 ([15]CVS log)
$Date: 2014-12-15 21:28:59 $
__________________________________________________________
[14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30
Check for newer version at [16]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/
[16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/yes//
Succeeded: s/pho9ne/phone/
Found Scribe: JF
Inferring ScribeNick: JF
Found Scribe: MarkS
Inferring ScribeNick: MarkS
Scribes: JF, MarkS
ScribeNicks: JF, MarkS
WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: JF MS MarkS NOTE SM ShaneM https inserted trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
<dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
<dbooth> Present+ amy
WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth
Found Date: 15 Dec 2014
Guessing minutes URL: [17]http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-m
inutes.html
People with action items: shanem
[17] http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html
[End of [18]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 21:33:47 UTC