- From: Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:26:04 -0400
- To: HTML A11Y TF Public <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, public-canvas-api@w3.org
Hello, The minutes for the Canvas Accessibility Sub Group Teleconference 28 APR 2014 are available in HTML and plain text below. Supporting information for this Sub Group can be found on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas HTML: http://www.w3.org/2014/04/28-html-a11y-minutes.html TEXT: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group Teleconference 28 Apr 2014 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/04/28-html-a11y-irc Attendees Present Janina Sajka, Mark Sadecki, Jay Munro, Ric Cabanier, Rich Schwerdtfeger Regrets Chair Mark Sadecki Scribe MarkS Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Final Review of Last Call Draft 2. [5]Implementations 3. [6]Testing 4. [7]Next Meeting * [8]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 28 April 2014 <scribe> Meeting: Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group Sub-Group <scribe> scribe: MarkS Final Review of Last Call Draft JM: I incorporated all changes we've agreed on. ... with the exception of the paragraph we had for the SoTD ... I have an email out to Robin and Sam regarding keeping that in this spec only. The SoTD has reusable components, I want to make sure this change only happens in Canvas and doesn't propagate to other HTML specs we could use this time to review that text JM: also waiting to hear back on other items related to going back to LC This draft incorporates changes made by the Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group [1] (minutes[2]) in response to comments from the HTML Accessibility Task Force [3] and adds support for visual focus indicators (drawFocusIfNeeded()[4]) and a method for informing accessibility APIs of the location of focusable regions (Hit Regions[5]). These features were carefully designed to be forward compatible with Canvas 2D Context, Level 2 [6]. [1] http://www.w3.org/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/04/28-html-a11y-irc RS: we might not want to limit it to focusable regions JS: i think notifying is more common RS: we should be consistent with drawFocusRing <richardschwerdtfeger> Optionally, inform the user that the focus is at the location given by the intended path. User agents may wait until the next time the event loop reaches its "update the rendering" step to optionally inform the user. RS: updating location information in Accessibility APIs <richardschwerdtfeger> Updating the accessibility API of the location of fallback elements that are representative of the corresponding hit region location. MS: I will re-wordsmith and send Jay the edits so we can get it back to the the WG Implementations MS: Rik has a patch pending with support for Canvas Level 1 RC: It's in code review now. MS: Once we get a new draft published for Last Call, I will contact dominic to get feedback and implementation timelines <jaymunro> [9]http://status.modern.ie/ [9] http://status.modern.ie/ RS: Be great to get IE Testing MS: Test results are currently showing drawFocusIf Needed tests as failing, probably because they are behind a flag RC: I will start the process for getting the feature to ship [10]https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/2dcon text/drawing-paths-to-the-canvas [10] https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/2dcontext/drawing-paths-to-the-canvas [11]https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/2dcon text/hit-regions [11] https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/2dcontext/hit-regions Next Meeting MS: should we continue to meet weekly? Should we start work on L2? Jay are L1 and L2 synced? JM: I took a look at that lately and there has been some diversion. They have been cherry picking changes from WHAT WG and those changes are overwritten some of the changes I made to L2. ... have been doing some research into the history of the cherry picking. We'll have to find a way to keep our changes. JS: we can do that. we just have to figure out if the changes are intentional or just an oversight. JM: I will follow up with editors to find out what the process is for applying changes from WHAT WG MS: I'm thinking that recurring items moving forward will be Implementations and testing and reviewing cherry picking for accessibility related items, suggest moving to every other week for this meeting? WFM RS: Is anyone going to talk to WCAG for techniques? JS: I could probably do that. Probably talk to James Nurthen about that. Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [12]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([13]CVS log) $Date: 2014-04-29 14:24:24 $ [12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 14:26:05 UTC