- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:59:35 +0100
- To: "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Online at http://www.w3.org/2013/10/03-html-a11y-minutes.html or below in plain text HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 03 Oct 2013 Present PaulC, JF, Suzanne, MarkS, Judy, DavidM, Cynthia Regrets Janina Chair chaals Scribe Suzanne Contents Topics longdesc Testing longdesc comment processing Consensus Procedures longdesc Testing Chaals: call for consensus on tests had very low turnout <MarkS> Longdesc testing WBS Chaals: appear that we have tests, though ... we need people who are able to run api tests <chaals> ACTION: marks to test longdesc in APIs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/10/03-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-200 - Test longdesc in apis [on Mark Sadecki - due 2013-10-10]. chaals: implementing long desc shouldn't be too diffult on brower side; validation seems okay - there are validators like that MarkS: should we extend the survey chaals: not sure if it would help JF: the tests look complete chaals: Even big groups like webapps might only get 2-3 people to really focus on viewing the tests ... it is very useful to have people look over and reply on even just some of the tests JF: will take a look; 60-70% through already <inserted> [Steve F documented how different browsers handle longdesc in accessibilty APIs] longdesc comment processing chaals: we have a wiki page with the comments that came in <MarkS> Longdesc comments wiki page chaals: we will go through a call for consensus process on each comment and if we agree with each, we will provide that as a comment and see how it goes; feel free to edit the wiki or write to the list ... in connection with any comment ... has anyone taken a look MarkS: took a look and made some edits; may need to edits to soften the language Consensus Procedures <MarkS> Consensus Procedure flowchart and email announcement <MarkS> Consensus Procedure Text chaals: a couple editorial changes ... replies will need to be on email or on survey, not in a teleconference ... changed term "natural days" to "consecutive days" Paul: why does the Task Force need a meeting to kick off a question? Chaals: We don't. PF wanted to be sure that a topic when open could be discussed in a teleconference ... 3 working days minimum and 7 consecutive days were mentioned <chaals> text of new proposal <chaals> s|-> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/team-html-a11y/2013Oct/0001.html Consensus Procedure flowchart and email announcement|| <chaals> s|-> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/team-html-a11y/2013Oct/att-0001/consensus-procedures.html Consensus Procedure Text| Paul: the three working days would have to include a Thursday in order to allow the teleconference Chaals: this policy doesn't use the teleconference to make the decision, just should be possible to get questions answered in a teleconference during the period <JF> me/ still cannot access that URL Cynthia: PF relies on teleconference and HTML doesn't work that way, this is some compromise JB: the intent was not emulate either, but to tailor to the needs of this taskforce ... taskforce needs to be able to set up it's own working processes, but is subject to the processes of the working groups, when the specs come up for publication there Paul: there are enough changes here, we'll have to re-run the CFC chaals: further business? subteam reports? PaulC: will the TF review the last call of MSE, which closes Oct 17 chaals: will take action to ensure it is placed on a future agenda (seems to be concern there is little time) <MarkS> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/media-source/media-source.html Paul: Media Streaming Extensions - output from the media task force - will probably go to CR quickly - we should look at it for sure chaals: let's close call and spend next 30 minutes to do longdesc tests, review MSE, or other useful tasks JB: we should get volunteers to do this chaals: unclear that we'll have anyone look. janina had expressed concerns <chaals> ACTION: chaals to look for review of MSE in the TF <trackbot> Created ACTION-201 - Look for review of mse in the tf [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-10-10]. <MarkS> ACTION: msadecki to look at MSE Spec <trackbot> Created ACTION-202 - Look at mse spec [on Mark Sadecki - due 2013-10-10]. david: does anyone have info on what janina's concern was? PC: can ping janina or search previous minutes JF: looked at MSE on a high level, and didn't see concerns ... might be good for a11y chaals: generally still a need for more review for this if anyone is available <paulc> Thanks and bye <chaals> [thanks Suzanne for scribing] -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 16:00:07 UTC