- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:53:47 +0400
- To: "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:34:43 +0400, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:
> On 20/06/2013 17:31 , Steve Faulkner wrote:
>> Hi Paul, I note in the overview of testing doc[1] that the following
>> sections are marked as Considered interoperable
>>
>> 1. 3.2.7.3 Strong Native Semantics
>> 2. 3.2.7.4 Implicit ARIA Semantics
>>
>> When at least some of the implementation requirements in the sections
>> are either not interoperably implemented or require verification
>
> Would you be more comfortable if we switched the status on those in the
> document?
I would.
> Note that this might require someone to actually go ahead and write
> tests :)
Yep. There are actually quite a lot of tests for ARIA, although I don't
know that they are readily available in the same format as other HTML5
tests...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 08:54:23 UTC