- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 19:34:49 +0000
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
> I will publish a new Editor's draft to go with the request, with a Status of the Document that clarifies the last call period, etc. Let me know when you have these items done so that the HTML WG Chairs can start a one week CfC in the HTML WG. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:46 PM To: public-html-a11y@w3.org Subject: Re: Call for Consensus: Publish HTML Image Descriptions as Last Call With no dissent, this call passes. We will therefore request the HTML and PF Working Groups to publish a Last Call of HTML Image Description Extension with a 60-day last call period. I will publish a new Editor's draft to go with the request, with a Status of the Document that clarifies the last call period, etc. Cheers Chaals On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:16:48 +0400, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Hi, > > this is a call for consensus on the proposal: > > THe HTML Accessibility Task Force requests that the HTML and PF > Working Groups jointly publish a Last Call Working Draft of the HTML > Image Description extension, based on the 24 June editor's draft at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-file/e2129bb908aa/longdesc1/ > longdesc.html > > Silence will be taken as assent, but a positive response is preferred. > Please respond to public-html-a11y@w3.org before the call closes at > midnight on Monday 1 July (Hawaii Time zone). > > Changes since the Second Public Working Draft of June 6 are editorial > in nature. The most significant ones are identified at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-file/e2129bb908aa/longdesc1/ > longdesc.html#changes > > There is one issue identified in the draft, which is a request for a > better reference for checking accessibility of content. We have > already agreed that if we don't find a more appropriate reference we > will simply close the bug and leave it as is. > > In addition, in a late comment on the last draft[1] Peter Gruzca > foreshadowed a potential issue of changing the requirement for making > longdesc discoverable from "should" to "must". In my reply[2], I have > requested that if he wishes to formally propose the issue he does so > as a comment on the Last Call (assuming we reach consensus and the > Last Call is published). > > [1] > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jun/0064.htm > l> > [2] > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jun/0071.htm > l> > > cheers > > Chaals > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 19:36:06 UTC