Re: Call for Consensus (5 days): Response on MSE

Since this is already possible with mediagroup, why is this change necessary? Sign language videos are often the test case examples for mediagroup. 


> On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm all for this.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:04 AM
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> this is a call for Consensus on the following proposition:
>> 
>> The HTML Accessibility Task Force requests that an informative note be
>> added to the MSE specification, pointing out that an important use case for
>> allowing more than one video track in an implementation is for the used of
>> sign language captions, typically done through a second, synchronised video.
>> 
>> In order to provide a timely reply to the HTML WG, Responses will be
>> accepted until midnight Hawaiian time on Tuesday 17 December. Silence will
>> be considered assent, but positive response is preferred.
>> 
>> Background:
>> This topic has been around for a few years, and Janina created a proposal
>> which includes suggested text:
>> <http://www.w3.org/mid/20131212044852.GV7703@concerto.rednote.net>
>> 
>> for the TF coordinators
>> 
>> Chaals
> 

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 17:47:31 UTC