- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:47:02 -0800
- To: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Cc: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Since this is already possible with mediagroup, why is this change necessary? Sign language videos are often the test case examples for mediagroup. > On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote: > > I'm all for this. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] >> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:04 AM >> >> Hi folks, >> >> this is a call for Consensus on the following proposition: >> >> The HTML Accessibility Task Force requests that an informative note be >> added to the MSE specification, pointing out that an important use case for >> allowing more than one video track in an implementation is for the used of >> sign language captions, typically done through a second, synchronised video. >> >> In order to provide a timely reply to the HTML WG, Responses will be >> accepted until midnight Hawaiian time on Tuesday 17 December. Silence will >> be considered assent, but positive response is preferred. >> >> Background: >> This topic has been around for a few years, and Janina created a proposal >> which includes suggested text: >> <http://www.w3.org/mid/20131212044852.GV7703@concerto.rednote.net> >> >> for the TF coordinators >> >> Chaals >
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 17:47:31 UTC