- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:52:22 +1100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML AccessibilityTask Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may know, the HTML5 spec is being updated weekly with patches from > the WHATWG spec they are categorised B1/B2/B3 (see forwarded below) the B1 > patches are editorial or viewed as in controversial in nature. Surely you mean "uncontroversial" ;-) . Note that I am also applying some patches that won't show in the HTML or Canvas spec because they are not enclosed in the < w3c-html > start and end markers. For example, this week we have a lot of WebVTT patches. You can safely ignore those parts. > I have been reviewing the patches as they are posted to the HTML WG list. I am very grateful for this feedback! > If I have found any that are problematic I have filed a bug or responded on > list. > > I suggest other interested people also take the time to review as what I > consider unproblematic patches may be viewed differently by others. I agree. In the past I have made the occasional mistake and it has only been pointed out after I applied the patches (e.g. removed a marker). I am doing these preparations to allow us all to catch such things beforehand. And I give a week's time for people to make the reviews. Your help is very much appreciated! Regards, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 11:53:09 UTC