- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 00:56:41 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> <a href="url">Transcript</a> >>> >>> >>> You can still do that. In the worst browser, it will make no difference, but >>> it seems likely that the best browsers will aim to provide something better >>> if they get something more than that. At the very least, it is pretty >>> straightforward to write an extension to handle more useful markup... >> >> Yes - that's more or less my point. The above works, and can be made >> better in shiny new browsers, so why not use it? > > This works, too: > > <transcript><a href="url">Transcript</a></transcript> > > and can be made even better in shiny new browsers than just the link alone. How so? AFAICT whatever browsers can do with that, they can do the same with: <video transcript=t></video> <a id=t href="url">Transcript</a> -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 23:57:31 UTC