- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:27:23 +1000
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > Hi, Silvia: > > Silvia Pfeiffer writes: >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >> > Minutes from the HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference of 10 May are provided below in text and are available as hypertext at: >> > >> > http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html >> > >> >> [..] >> >> > >> > Media Accessibility User Requirements, annotations/pointers to spec >> > >> > <JF> scribe: JF >> > >> > JS: have been meaning to surface this for some time >> > >> > would like to move the user requirements from a Draft note >> > >> > thought it might be useful to annotate this in the HTML5 spec to link technologies to techniques (etc.) >> > >> > Silvia offered to do this and felt it would be easy to do >> > >> > so, do we want to take that document in that direction? >> > >> > PF thought this was a good idea on their call yesterday >> > >> > should we pursue? >> > >> > (JF says +1) >> > >> > SF: Is this annotating the HTML5 spec or the User Reqs document? >> > >> > JS: the user reqs doc >> > >> > MS: question seems does anyone thing this is a good idea. If Silvia has offered to do this, and it has no direct >> > changes to HTML5 spec, then are there objections? >> > ... seems like a useful bit of work >> > ... guessing that Silvia wanted to ensure that others saw the value, and agreed before she undertook the effort >> > >> > JF: +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks >> > >> > <Stevef> +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks >> > >> > JS: I will discuss this with Silvia - worth noting that the media team are re-convening on short notice - actually >> > meeting later today >> >> Does this refer to creating an update of >> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/ with links to the parts >> in the spec that realize the different requirements? > > > Precisely. We discussed this briefly in email this past March. See > especially: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Mar/0353.html Would this require that I join another WG? Regards, Silvia.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 21:28:13 UTC