Re: discussion of video transcript - issue 194

• From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
• Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:22:34 +0100
• To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
• Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAEhSh3coXAM-JK+bhOjE4_3iCUDGanZi+LAh8QurCHVY847aFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the first draft of a proposal that we've recently started
> discussing at Google:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/Issue194_SP
>
> Please read with an open mind and feel free to make suggestions for improvement.

If we're going to reuse @for and @id, we should probably make the
following work as well to match how these attributes work with
<label>:

<transcript>
<video id=v1 src=video.mp4></video>
<p>This is a on-page transcript.</p>
</transcript>

There might be rationale to make the following work as well:

<video id=v1 src=video.mp4></video>
<transcript>
<p>This is a on-page transcript.</p>
</transcript>

<label>Label</label><input>

<label>Label</label><select></select>

<input type="checkbox"><label>Label</label>

<input type="radio"><label>Label</label>

But this would need testing for compatibility with the existing corpus.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 08:23:36 UTC