- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:18:35 +1100
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, david.bolter@gmail.com, jbrewer@w3.org, faulkner.steve@gmail.com, mike@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger > <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> This is an unofficial draft of aria-describedat that Steve and I are working >> on for ARIA 1.1. Mike, thanks for putting setting us up with a work page. >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/aria-unofficial/raw-file/tip/describedat.html > > Thanks for sharing. > > Some feedback. > > - One of the problems with longdesc has been that its data type is not > obvious. The name should reflect the fact that it is a URL. e.g. > "aria-descriptionurl" or "aria-describeaturl" would be better. > "aria-descriptionurl" has the advantage of being a little harder to > confuse with "aria-describedby". It surprises me that after all the > problems with the naming of "longdesc" people are proposing adding a > similarly ambiguous name. Interesting point. How would descriptionhref or descriptionref work? > - What's the rationale for adding yet more attributes with the "aria-" prefix? It's part of the aria set of technologies and developed as part of these technologies in WAI, so logically added with the same custom prefix as the other aria technologies. I think that's fair enough. We could, instead, propose it as a HTML attribute, drop the "aria-" part and make sure it gets into HTML5 and developed by the HTML WG. Is that what you're suggesting? Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 23:19:25 UTC