- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:38:32 -0600
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
All: Laura has reminded me what the problem is with "obsolete but conforming" for longdesc. In my mind I think in terms of "deprecated," as commonly used in standards development. However, if we need to specify the replacement in order to apply "obsolete but conforming," we're clearly not there yet as there's no ARIA-DescribedAt to point to, and will not be for some time still. Janina Laura Carlson writes: > > 2. Obsolete but conforming features trigger HTML5 warnings with advice > to use a specific and different solution. [2] .... > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/obsolete.html#obsolete-but-conforming-features > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 23:43:46 UTC