- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:41:51 +0000
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli writes: > Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:04:16 +0100: > > Janina Sajka, Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:47:51 +0000: > > >>> Question: Is there a chance that "we could do" @aria-describedat *now*? > >>> I am convinced that the chances for a amicable solution would increase > >>> greatly if one could move from talk to action with regard to > >>> @aria-describedat. > >> > >> You're asking the core question, imho. I wish we could simply say "yes" > >> and be done with it, > > > >> Unfortunately, ARIA-DescribedAt doesn't exist anywhere except on our "To > >> Do" list. > > > > So, the process is the reason we can't say 'use @aria-describedat' ... Heavens, no! Explain to me, if you think the process is at fault, why we should drop everything currently in process to create a substitute for somethingthat already exists. Please explain this wisdom, because it sounds like folly to me. Janina
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 20:42:16 UTC