- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:04:16 +0100
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Janina Sajka, Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:47:51 +0000: > Leif Halvard Silli writes: >> Question: Is there a chance that "we could do" @aria-describedat *now*? >> I am convinced that the chances for a amicable solution would increase >> greatly if one could move from talk to action with regard to >> @aria-describedat. > > You're asking the core question, imho. I wish we could simply say "yes" > and be done with it, > Unfortunately, ARIA-DescribedAt doesn't exist anywhere except on our "To > Do" list. So, the process is the reason we can't say 'use @aria-describedat' ... I can understand that vendors are not so keen on implementing something that is meant as a temporary solution, only. May be we should simply recommend authors to, when @longdesc is needed, use HTML4? After all, there exists a DTD for HTML4 with ARIA support ... ... > That leaves only longdesc on the table. It exists today, it's > implemented and used today. It should be in the spec today. > > The HTML Chairs simply got it wrong in their Issue-30 decision back in > August 2010 when they claimed longdesc wasn't needed because: > > "alternatives exists (explicit links, aria-describedby, figure > captions) ..." > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/att-0112/issue-30-decision.html > > As we've since discovered in much discussion, Describedby wasn't an > workable option then, and it isn't one now. Neither are Fig-Caption or > direct links workable options today--or then. I agree. But even if we get @longdesc, it still - when it works - only works on the <img> element. >>> agreement in room: longdesc and describedat are preferable to this > They can't pick up Describedat because, it doesn't exist, not in our > spec, not in browsers, not anywhere except in our intentions. Someday it > will exist. Until then the longdesc attribute meets the current need and > should simply be retained. That it isn't is a slap in the face to > accessibility, imho. A problem with @longdesc is the the very varying degree of support: It has no room within ARIA [*], only some screenreader support it and extremely few Web browsers UAs are running with @longdesc support enabled. [*] ARIA: Despite that @aria-describeAT was not included, why doesn't ARIA 1.0 include @longdesc its Accessible Name Calculation algorithm? After all, in a AT such as JAWS, the longdesc is presented to the user? Or how would you describe the text that Jaws announces - 'Link to long description' - if not as part of the accessible name? -- Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 19:05:00 UTC