- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:36:49 -0400
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>,'Jonas Sicking' <jonas@sicking.cc>, 'Edward O'Connor' <eoconnor@apple.com>, 'Cynthia Shelly' <cyns@microsoft.com>, 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>,public-html@w3.org, 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, 'Frank Olivier' <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, 'W3C WAI Protocols & Formats' <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
At 12:25 PM 6/8/2012 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: >On 06/08/2012 12:12 PM, John Foliot wrote: >>Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>>The next step the chairs will take is to proceed to a survey. >>>Meanwhile, the chairs are giving those who are working on the various >>>proposals to work together. In fact, the only reason we've held off >>>proceeding to a survey is in response to a request by Judy and Janina >>>as they felt that consensus was possible. >> >>This discussion is on-going at the bequest of the Chairs. > >Correction: as I stated above, the only reason we've held off >proceeding to a survey is in response to a request by Judy and Janina. I believe that the characterization of delays on proceeding to a survey on 204 -- given that issue 204 was put in front of issue 30 over our protest, and that we have repeatedly been advised by the HTML Co-Chairs to seek additional consensus on this -- is out of context with the history of delays caused by 204 in returning to Issue 30. I am further unclear why you interrupted Janina's reaching out on this question, which we had discussed with you. - Judy >- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 16:37:21 UTC