[Fwd: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org WG <public-html@w3.org>
Subject: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:36:41 -0400

At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two 
proposals.

   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden
   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4

In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some 
indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity 
to update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate 
as to how long that would take.

So regarding the "InstateLongdesc" proposal[1]...

1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the 
InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you 
estimate that it would take?

2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be 
selected, would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if 
so, how long do you estimate that it would take?

I want to emphasize that this query is solely for planning purposes and 
will not affect the outcome of issue 204.

The survey on issue 204 closes on Friday August 3rd.  A response by that 
time would be greatly appreciated.

- Sam Ruby

[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:  ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections
Resent-Date:  Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:19:07 +0000
Resent-From:  public-html@w3.org
Date:  Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:18:04 +0000
From:  Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
To:  public-html@w3.org <public-html@w3.org>



ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204

The HTML WG has not reached consensus on how to exempt ARIA attributes
from the rule that prohibits reference to hidden elements.

The poll is available here and it will run through Fri Aug 3:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-204-objection-poll/

Please read the introductory text before entering your response.

In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only
need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly
strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked
objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's
objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and
will not be counting votes.

/paulc

HTML WG co-chair

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada

17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3

Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 17:39:25 UTC