- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:58:23 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chaals McCathieNevile <w3b@chaals.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Silvia Pfeiffer, Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:39:49 +0200: > >> I've tried to argue this line of thought before, too. >> >> I've come to the conclusion that a transcript is indeed one type of >> long description > > +1 ... but not every long description is a transcript! :-) >> and likely sufficient as a text replacement for >> video. However, there are other types of long descriptions that people >> may also want to publish and the @longdesc (@aria-describedat) >> attribute is more appropriate for those. I personally don't think >> those other types of long descriptions are necessary, since if you >> have a full-text transcript (or better even a collated transcript [1]) >> you get all the information that you need - and summaries are usually >> published somewhere else on the page, such as in a description >> section, so @aria-describedby is more appropriate there. But I've come >> to accept that there may not always be a transcript and such other >> type of long description may be easier to author and publish then. > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CORE-TECHS/#collated-transcripts > > As I just said to Laura,[1] that section of the WCAG 1.0 techniques > seemingly operates with a 'transcripts from sounds only' concept. > However, the preceding section about 'Visual information and motion' > makes it clear that a collated transcript may include transcriptions > from an auditory description track. It goes on to say that "Auditory > descriptions are used primarily by people who are blind". However, for > someone reading a transcript, it usually doesn't matter who it was made > for, as one does usually not consume the transcript in parallel with > the running video, but as an independent piece of art. Sometimes. But sometimes people consume the transcript together with the video. In particular this is the case for interactive transcripts. I wouldn't want to limit our use of transcripts to those without video - often times when you read the transcript, you also like to watch parts of the video at the same time. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 17:59:14 UTC