- From: 'Janina Sajka' <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:04:25 -0500
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: "'Charles Pritchard'" <chuck@jumis.com>, "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis'" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, "'John Foliot'" <john@foliot.ca>, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
David: This is indeed about time based media. It arises out of a requirements gathering process that is on its way to becoming a PF published W3C Note, current most mature draft (and still available for comments) available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/src/media-a11y-req.html We want to make certain we've covered two specific use cases: 1.) A transcript that contains time data can be played along with the media (video or audio). 2.) A transcription without time data can still be provided in a manner programmatically associated with the media. The Issue-194 CP is about #2. hth Janina David MacDonald writes: > Perhaps a nit... but WCAG does not require transcripts on images. They are for time based media. > > Cheers > David MacDonald > > ... access empowers ... > ... barriers disable ... > www.eramp.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Pritchard [mailto:chuck@jumis.com] > Sent: February-14-12 9:15 PM > To: Silvia Pfeiffer > Cc: David Singer; Janina Sajka; Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis; John Foliot; public-html@w3.org; public-html-a11y@w3.org > Subject: Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 > > Seconded. > > Transcriptions are about capturing the content in text; an gosh could we use that for img too. > > I could easily reuse alt, longdesc an transcript on the same image and have three very different blocks. > > -Charles > > On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Well, this is why I wanted the attribute to be called @transcription > > rather than @transcript, because it should contain everything a user > > needs to read in order to get the same "experience" that a user gets > > who watches the film. So to me transcript = captions + descriptions > > (roughly). > > > > Silvia. > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:24 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> Does seem that a *description* of a video and a *transcript* are quite distinct. > >> > >> In this video, a transcript might end: > >> > >> > >> heedi hoo! heedie hoo! > >> > >> Do-NUT! > >> > >> a description might be more�informative. > >> > >> > >> David Singer > >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >> > >> > > > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 21:05:36 UTC