- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:59:55 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 --- Comment #40 from Bob Lund <b.lund@cablelabs.com> 2012-02-01 15:59:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > It does seem unnecessarily complicated. All for possible simplification. > For the usage described (enabling a > script to find its metadata track), all that's needed is to expose a single > string from the track to the script. For WebM the contents of the track's > CodecID element would be appropriate and sufficient. If CodecID provides the same information as TrackType, e.g. distinguishes between subtitle and control, then I agree. Otherwise it seems TrackType provides essential information in determining a text track type. >For Ogg, the contents of > the 'name' field should be enough. Similar simplifications for the other > formats should be possible. According to [1], "Role describe what semantic type of content is contained in a track" and "This field (Name) provides the opportunity to associate a free text string with the track". If only one of these fields can be provided I think Role would be more appropriate as it's values are defined. However, Role still doesn't fully identify the type of data in, for example, text/metadata, so it seems Name could be useful. > > Comment #37 seems to be trying to create a feature that exposes a subset of the > container-specific per-track metadata to script, which is overkill for the > use-cases described in comment #0. IMHO. [1] http://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:00:02 UTC