- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:30:39 -0700
- To: "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis'" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, <public-html@w3.org>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
David Singer wrote: > > > >Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > > > I'm pretty sure I didn't suggest that. I don't think a mouth-stick user > > > who is not visually impaired would ever be exposed to the link, > > > > So then this technique is *ONLY* for visually impaired users? > > maybe I am being naive here, but surely the rule is, for any UA "if you expose > the link to the user, you must also be prepared to expose the content it links > to". Not at all, I think that this is one of the key discussion points of this thread. At the risk of being intemperate, I think that the current Proposal is that which is naive. It proposes that a class of HTML-rich content only be exposed, in its full HTML richness, to users who can "hear it" but will never see it (and as I write that, I wonder aloud how a Deaf person might access this content today as well). At least this is my interpretation of Maciej's initial response to me. I have not heard back from him since I posed my questions. JF
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 20:31:23 UTC