- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:03:40 -0400
- To: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Ted (Mike, Henri, others): Is there any possibility of merging this proposal with the "Mint a new attribute for relaxing alt attribute conformance criteria in certain situations" proposal: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-206 Yes, there are clear differences (they even are enumerated in Laura's updated proposal), but it appears to me that these two proposals are relatively close in spirit. The essential difference (other than spelling) appears to be the default? - Sam Ruby On 08/01/2012 04:42 PM, Laura Carlson wrote: > Hi Sam and all, > > I updated my previous proposal on the meta generator issue: The "Add > an incomplete attribute for the <img> element" proposal can be found > at: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Lcarlson/ImgElement > > Group discussion of the pros and cons of it, would be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Laura >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 22:04:13 UTC