- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 07:43:08 -0700
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force (public-html-a11y@w3.org)" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On May 21, 2011, at 2:39 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> I don't think we should (a) stray from normal industry parlance or (b) assume that it's always the speech that is the main program content. > > I agree. Since we are talking about a technology that diverges from > what the industry labels as "clean audio", we should therefore not use > the same term. > Can you say how you think we are differing from the concept of 'clean audio'? I agree that the way clean audio is achieved in various systems varies (quite widely) -- e.g. by isolating to a channel or two in some multi-channel environments, but I think we can achieve clean audio in HTML (and we should, and should at least conceive of the labeling for all sorts of conditions, such as high-contrast video). > Silvia. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 14:43:53 UTC