- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:12:59 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12590 --- Comment #5 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2011-05-10 14:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) >That is: they don't read the @title in that case? Do you have a list of AT >which behave different from VoiceOver? correct, any AT that use an accessibility API to convey image information. >According to Fangs forget about fangs it is of no use in this context. >I have checked your table with 'Screen reader software support for the TITLE >attribute' from 2005, and for some reason, for the IMG element it says "not >tested": >http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/articles/WE05/forms.html thats because i didn't get around to testing it at the time. >Note that this bug is not about what is *valid*. It is about what implicit >*role* an image with a non-empty @title in combination with an empt @alt does >get. as specced it gets no role. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:13:01 UTC