Re: Moving longdesc forward: Recap, updates, consensus

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis, Sat, 7 May 2011 19:23:08 +0100:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
> <> wrote:
>> That might be what you had in mind in your poll comment - however
>> w.r.t. your longdesc lottery article ...
> Mark Pilgrim not Tantek wrote the longdesc lottery post:
> Or is there another one?

Sorry, Tantek. I mixed it up. My bad.

It would nevertheless would be interesting to know whether, during the 
longdesc lottery article, it was discovered that kind link rot that you 
described. I cannot recall it from reading it and/or from trying to 
digest the data it presented. Other problems are fare more important, 
it seems to me.
Leif H Silli

Received on Saturday, 7 May 2011 19:01:03 UTC