- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:11:07 +0100
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20110505160703.M6223@hicom.net>
aloha!
minutes from the 5 May 2011 HTML Accessibility Task Force telecon
can be accessed as hypertext at:
http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-html-a11y-minutes.html
as an IRC log at:
http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-html-a11y-irc
and as plain text following this announcement -- as usual, please
report any errors, omissions, clarifications, mis-attributions,
and the like by replying-to this announcement on-list...
thanks to Steve and Leonie for providing the bulk of the minuting...
volunteers for scribing for the next 2 TF calls (12 May and 19 May
2011) should contact MikeSmith and/or Janina
_________________________________________________________
- DRAFT -
HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
05 May 2011
Agenda
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011May/0088.html
See also: IRC log - http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-html-a11y-irc
Attendees
Present
Eric, Gregory_Rosmaita, JF, Leonie_Watson, Stevef, mranon,
paulc
Regrets
Janina, Rich, Cynthia_Shelly, Laura_Carlson, Silvia_Pfieffer,
Kenny_Johar, Michael_Cooper
Chair
Mike_Smith
Scribe
Stevef, oedipus, Leonie_Watson
Contents
* Topics
1. Media subteam report
2. Text subteam
3. Canvas sub team
4. ARIA Mapping/Bug Triage
5. Review of Open Action Items
6. Scribe for Next Week
* Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 05 May 2011
<MikeSmith> Zaki, this will be WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)
<MikeSmith> scribe: Stevef
Media subteam report
MS: stuffed up the passcode, remember to chnage for next time
JF doing mop up on issue 152 multi track API, essentially resolved,
discussion about @king attributes, spec shows 5, but wiki page with
other values, at least 3 more and maybe some others
JF: require captions and subtitles, maybe commentary still being
discussed, bug filed against this item.
... as far as spec, john is unsure
MS: is there anything that chairs are waiting on?
JF: not that i know
... 2-3 bugs resolved
... if we can get @kind values resolved amicaably before last call
should be good
Text subteam
MS: any questions, no move on
<MikeSmith> scribe: oedipus
SF: met monday -- discussing validation issues with text
alternatives with judy and on list using the [text] subject line tag
-- reopening issues -- gathering information on validation issue
decisions
... ones most worked on at the moment: meta genarator and @title --
also work on role=presentation (would like to revisit)
... talk about FIGCAPTION -- trying to reason it out rather than
reopen at this time -- agree on for past 2 years -- judy and geoff
(WBGH) working on FIGCAPTION and longdesc
<JF> +q
SF: moved formal objection for @alt and @title -- waiting on
response
<Stevef> oedipus: i can take it back now
JF: also work on meta genarator decision -- fairly verbose
discussion currently -- whittle down to 2 parts to present all
evidence and in more sumarized fashion
SF: issue of meta genarator tag a generic thing that was used in
past in a LOT of published content -- didn't do to placate validator
JF: 10 years of legacy content with meta generator strings -- must
be considered
... turning meta genarator string into "magic token" is problem
SF: meta generator exceptions and error rules in HTML5 investigated?
... MikeSmith know of any?
... have meta generator that is exception to use of @alt -- shuts up
validator -- any other errors that tell validator to ignore specific
syntax
... can imagine if press rules, will be other requests for rules --
why a single exception for @alt
MS: worded in spec not to suppress error, but says alt required
unsless there is a meta tag with name="generator" or a @title
<JF> +q
SF: flagging a conformance error
MS: could perceive that way, but are other things in same class --
not unique in that regard
... behavior class performance criteria for others as for generator
-
SF: examples?
MS: select element has required attribute and no multiple attr and
size of 1 (have to compute, not just value of attr) if all are case,
must have option attr that either has a value attr or doesn't have
any text content
... other cases: complicated assertions in spec
SF: doesn't have anything to do with setting flag via meta generator
... is there a flag one can set for changing error to non-error?
... happy to discuss offline with MS
MS: happy to discuss offline -- not the only case
JF: interested in question by SF -- what we have is a meta string --
example you gave VERY tightly focused -- generator string in hand of
document and effects ENTIRE document -- for CMS systems when in
template can negatively affect entire site
... anything in spec that changes performance criteria for entire
document
MS: this case is an extreme one, but not the only one
... presence of single element with certain attr in document affects
every image in document
... talked with SF about this offline, but think in terms of
validator behavior, don't think many users will expect when put in
meta generator element in document that that means they are opting
out of checking for @alt on img -- something consciously doing by
adding generator? -- that to me is strong argument -- people want
conformance checker to alert them to things that might otherwise
miss
JF: CMS supports 150 content authors who don't see code ever -- just
add content to template -- don't know what meta generator string is
-- 3rd party conformance tools have to deal with fact that @alt not
needed if meta generator inserted -- allowed because of meta
generator string -- assert most authors willl have NO idea they are
creating a problem because generator string says confromant
<Leonie_Watson> +1 to JF
MS: conformance checker hat on this doesn't seem to be optimal
behaviour -- should persue, but not now -- supportive of trying to
see whether this is what other people working on ER tools think is
acceptable behavior
... talk with henri about it on list good approach
JF: ping RichS from IBM
SF: OpenAjax Alliance
MS: FIGCAPTION -- state of things: had agreement with TF just a few
weeks ago --changed -- don't know how or why
i don't remember consensus on FIGCAPTION
<JF> JF wanted to include the wiki page for the @kind values for the
multi-track API discussion:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Track_Kinds
SF: misunderstanding in regards what WAI-CG agreed to over 2 years
ago -- spec changed
... FIGCAPTION supposed to be a caption, not a text alternative --
use cases that are WCAG conformant that a CAPTION is sufficient
textual alternative
MS: think we need to not operate under assumption that HTML WG
chairs are going to delay LC for Text Subteam to complete work and
have reviewed by TF -- not prudent assumption -- chairs plan to
follow tight schedule for September 2011 publication -
... need to bring up for discussion in TF
JF: suggest MS discuss this with Judy Brewer
MS: anything else on text subteam?
<Stevef> SF: FIGCAPTION supposed to be a caption, not a text
alternative -- use cases that are WCAG conformant that a CAPTION is
sufficient textual alternative
<Stevef> <img role="presentation" title="poot">
SF: if no @alt, but @title, role still presentation for element/attr
and will NOT be in A11y API or accessible to ATs
... allowing that to occur means that it will not work for AT users
-- role=presentation means content not available
<MikeSmith> scribe: Leonie_Watson
JF: What does title do for us from an accessibility perspective?
... It seems to me that until the browsers do something useful with
title...
SF: There is an implementation issue here that needs to be resolved.
The conformance rule is contradictory.
... Either the spec has to change, or the implementation has to
change.
<oedipus> GJR: @title has NO place in graphical/visual rendering
space -- if no @alt, no text inline -- only @title available
onMouseOver (device dependent and impermenant [only rendered for a
short time and then disappears
JF: We have incomplete support for the title attrib, in that it only
produces a tooltip in most browsers. For users with cognitive
issues, you could argue this is helpful.
<Zakim> oedipus, you wanted to say working on @summary for table and
issue of hidden versus discoverable metadata
JF: It's not available to all users though, only some users.
MS: It sounds as though there's still some work to be done, but that
there are people working on it.
Canvas sub team
GJR: We've been working via email. We're waiting for the results of
Rich's latest exchange with Ian. We're waiting for the inter group
dynamic to work itself out. I think there is movement there.
... We're also aggresively pursuing testing canvas with ATs and
browsers. We've gotten very good feedback/participation from AT
providers.
MS: I don't think there's anything the TF needs to step in on there.
<MikeSmith> scribe: oedipus
ARIA Mapping/Bug Triage
MS: pertient people not here --
JF: bug triage team needs to take a new pass after last few weeks of
action
Review of Open Action Items
<MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open
MS: nothing with high priority -- a bunch due recently for text
alternatives sub-team -- doesn't need further review
... don't need to reveiw as group
Scribe for Next Week
MS: volunteer for 12 May 2011?
... Janina will chair next week
... other business?
[ADJOURNED]
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 16:11:36 UTC