Re: [text] updated draft, 20110430, of clarification on alt validation

Leif Halvard Silli, Mon, 2 May 2011 00:09:10 +0200:
>> 
>> I agree this could result in more accessible content than missing @alt;
>> I disagree it would not be a violation of ATAG 2.
> 
> 'be a violation': The guidelines themselves uses the verb 'meet' (40 
> times, in various conjugations).

Sorry: 71 times, is to be correct.
-- 
Leif Halvard Silli

Received on Sunday, 1 May 2011 22:18:23 UTC