- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:26:18 -0700
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, 'Charles Pritchard' <chuck@jumis.com>, 'Charles McCathieNevile' <chaals@opera.com>, 'Richard Schwerdtfeger' <schwer@us.ibm.com>, 'Cameron McCormack' <cam@mcc.id.au>, 'Cynthia Shelly' <cyns@microsoft.com>, david.bolter@gmail.com, 'Frank Olivier' <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, Mike@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:32 PM, John Foliot wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> The WHATWG wiki pages for Video Caption and Modal Dialog use cases >> exemplify what is meant by compiling clear use-cases: >> * >> <http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Use_cases_for_timed_tracks_rendered_over_v >> ideo_by_the_UA> >> >> They examine existing usage to discover what features are important, >> and give several examples of each. This way we can tell directly >> whether the solutions we're crafting are adequate, by attempting to >> recreate the examples with the proposed solution. > > And right there, you've identified the disconnect. Those "use cases" for > video captioning are, frankly, bollocks, as they do not address a > significant amount of accessibility concerns. John, this kind of language is not appropriate for public-html. Please strive to keep it professional. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 23:27:04 UTC