- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:47:44 -0400
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> (jbrewer@w3.org)" <jbrewer@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 12:41 -0700, Mark Watson wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > > I like your proposed reply, except this last part. > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 10:34 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > > There will be no URN to specify these names. > > > Specifying a URN is no more than giving a permanent machine-readable > name to the list of values (not, it's not a URN for each individual > value). It has not cost (URNs are an infinite resource) and has value > in that it enables the kinds we specify to be referred to in other > protocols, specifically DASH. I think that Silvia meant to say there is no need for a URN for the HTML5 track kinds. Those will be included in the HTML5 specification. Philippe
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 19:47:53 UTC