Re: Track kinds

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 12:41 -0700, Mark Watson wrote:
> Hi Silvia,
> I like your proposed reply, except this last part.
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 10:34 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> > There will be no URN to specify these names.
> Specifying a URN is no more than giving a permanent machine-readable
> name to the list of values (not, it's not a URN for each individual
> value). It has not cost (URNs are an infinite resource) and has value
> in that it enables the kinds we specify to be referred to in other
> protocols, specifically DASH.

I think that Silvia meant to say there is no need for a URN for the
HTML5 track kinds. Those will be included in the HTML5 specification.


Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 19:47:53 UTC