- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:21:01 -0600
- To: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Geoff, This sounds like a very important use case to add to the change proposal to reinstate longdesc into HTML. Thank you very much for this new information. Best Regards, Laura On 2/25/11, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org> wrote: > > Hi, everyone: > > Benetech, NCAM and the DAISY Consortium are currently collaborating on a > five-year project funded by the U.S. Department of Education to help find > ways to make image descriptions in textbooks for print-disabled students > more effective and less costly. You can read all about the project at > http://diagramcenter.org/ . > > Regarding the long-running discussions over image descriptions: any new > version of HTML that lacks a mechanism for conveying long image descriptions > to users will be a severe blow to blind, visually impaired and > print-disabled users worldwide, as well as a huge setback to decades of work > done in the accessibility industry. In addition to the arguments already > offered on these lists in favor of a long-description mechanism, bear in > mind that long descriptions are typically produced after the original > content has been published. They are often likely be produced by volunteers > (via a variety of methods, including crowdsourcing) and third parties who > are contracted to create sophisticated descriptions for complex images (such > as those found in science and math textbooks). This is particularly true in > the case of online textbooks and digital textbooks. Without @longdesc, it > will be very difficult to incorporate descriptions into new or existing > textbooks or other content. > > Furthermore, those hosted descriptions will be living documents which may > need to be improved upon in a collaborative and moderated fashion. This is > particularly true in the case of e-books- volumes which have already been > downloaded by users could easily benefit from new, expanded or otherwise > updated image descriptions. > > If we want HTML to be a foundational standard for reading technologies, such > as e-books, then it is critical that @longdesc continue to be supported. > Even if @longdesc is reinstated as an interim technology while something new > is developed to replace it, it is still the best technology that the DIAGRAM > project (not to mention textbook publishers, universities and others around > the world) can build upon today to accomplish our objectives around > improving the accessibility of images in digital textbooks. > > Geoff Freed > WGBH/NCAM, on behalf of the DIAGRAM project -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 20:21:37 UTC