- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:07:45 -0700
- To: public-canvas-api@w3.org, dmazzoni@google.com
- Cc: chuck@jumis.com, david.bolter@gmail.com, franko@microsoft.com, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA22DE2D1.8549EE93-ON86257836.00776CE6-86257836.00798F8C@us.ibm.com>
Agenda: February 14, 2011 Canvas Accessibility Working Group Time of meeting is 3:00PM EST, 20:00 UTC, duration is 1 hour Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 2119 ("A11Y") IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #html-a11y. 1. Caret/Selection Position and Blink Rate. Are people satisfied with the changes to the caret/selection Position attached? Rich separated out definitions for caret and selection position (per Benjamin's request) and made some changes to the user agent caret and selection tracking. Content selection does not always mean an element has to have focus - unlike the caret. 2. SVG caret/selection pos. At the last call Chuck preferred to NOT have caret and selection position reflect the drawing path so it was not changed. Benjamin suggested that we move caret/selection position to the James Craig proposal to add support for SVG but we don't know what will become of that proposal. Do we stick our current proposal? If so, Rich will update the change proposal and send out to group this week. 3. Chuck do you have a working modification to Chrome for focus ring and caret/selection pos that we can send to AISquared for testing? 4. Review outstanding bugs to re-assign and or agree on closure. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11238 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11239 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11240 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11241 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11242 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11328 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11329 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11342 4. The HTML working group response to Frank Olivier's question on whether to limit canvas fallback content was to not limit the fallback content: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0175.html - Frank http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0176.html - Ian http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0178.html - Maciej Rich: I recommend we not submit the canvas element (attached) changes. We need a group vote. 3. Rich Text editing supportCaret, Selection, Grammar errors, spelling Annotation - Do the user agent manufacturers agree to do further work on rich text editing? - Where we are: - Rich proposal for marking caret, selected content, grammar errors, spelling errors using HTML 5 and ARIA with modifications http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2011JanMar/0001.html - Positioning information of content is required - per AISquared feedback (See minutes from last meeting) Minutes last call: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/07-html-a11y-minutes.html Referenced documents and test examples (See attached file: CanvasEditor.html)(See attached file: HTML Canvas 2DContext20110211.html)(See attached file: HTML_Canvas_Element.html) Rich Schwerdtfeger CTO Accessibility Software Group Rich Schwerdtfeger CTO Accessibility Software Group
Attachments
- text/html attachment: CanvasEditor.html
- text/html attachment: HTML_Canvas_2DContext20110211.html
- text/html attachment: HTML_Canvas_Element.html
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2011 22:08:46 UTC