hi sam, what you cited says - Jan 22, 2010 - cutoff for escalating bugs for pre-LC consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued by this date Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be treated as a Last Call comment. this was not an escalation, it was already a bug that had been escalated, it was already an issue, a call for proposals had already been issued. the timeline says: Feb 23, 2011 - every issue has at least one Change Proposal Consequences of missing this date: issues will be closed without prejudice and marked POSTPONED; can be reconsidered during LC or for a later version of HTML. the issue has one change proposal. it would be good if the chairs followed their own rules. regards Stevef On 1 February 2011 21:57, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 02/01/2011 04:28 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > >> Can the chairs please explain why it has not been re-opened as a pre >> last call issue when it was filed prior to the cutoff and closed without >> prejudice due to lack of change proposal. >> > > All escalations after Jan 22, 2011 will be treated as a Last Call comment: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html > > - Sam Ruby > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:19:17 UTC