Re: request to re-open issue 133 due to submission of a change prposal.

Can the chairs please explain why it has not been re-opened as a pre last
call issue when it was filed prior to the cutoff and closed without
prejudice due to lack of change proposal.

it is not the case that all change proposals for all pre last call issues
have been provided is it?

why is this pre -last call issue being shunted when there are many still
going out for call?

from last weeks html wg agenda:

6. New Calls this week

a) ISSUE-131: caret-location-API, Change Proposals due Feb 21
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0200.html

b) ISSUE-152: multitrack-media-resources, Change Proposals due Feb 21
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0198.html

c) ISSUE-155: table-border, Change Proposals due Feb 21
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0199.html

c) ISSUE-156: permit-close-tag, Change Proposals due Feb 21
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0250.html

d) ISSUE-157: image-map-spec, Change Proposals due Feb 23
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0272.html

e) ISSUE-158: object-content-model, Change Proposals due Feb 23
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0273.html

f) ISSUE-160: menuless-commands, Change Proposals due Feb 23
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0273.html

g) ISSUE-161: accessibility-api-mapping, Change Proposals due Feb 23
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0283.html

h) ISSUE-128: figure-in-p, Call for Consensus due Feb 2
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0369.html



On 31 January 2011 23:28, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  The WG Chairs agree to re-open ISSUE-133 in light of the change proposal
> that has been provided but we have re-opened it as a Last Call issue NOT as
> a pre-Last Call Issue.
>
>
>
> Note that we recently enhanced the Product field of the HTML WG Tracker
> instance and all the outstanding pre-Last Call issues have been converted so
> that their Product field refers to a Product value which has the prefix of
> “pre-LC1” .  Note that the re-opened ISSUE-133 will have a Product field
> value of “HTML 5 spec” which currently means it is a Last Call issue.
>
>
>
> WG members might be interested to know that ISSUE-133 now joins ISSUE-150,
> ISSUE-151, ISSUE-153 and ISSUE-154 as Last Call issues.
>
>
>
> /paulc
>
>
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 29, 2011 5:58 PM
> *To:* Maciej Stachowiak; Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby
> *Cc:* Cynthia Shelly; E.J. Zufelt; HTML Accessibility Task Force; HTMLWG
> WG
>
> *Subject:* request to re-open issue 133 due to submission of a change
> prposal.
>
>
>
> Dear Chairs,
>
> please consider re-opening issue 133 (
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/133)
>
> which was 'Closed without prejudice due to lack of Change Proposal.'
>
> as a change proposal has now been developed.
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/modal
>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html