- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:34:35 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12834 --- Comment #26 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2011-12-05 17:34:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > Here's what I need to be able to evaluate the proposal in this bug: > > > Please provide a complete example showing what result you want, and how you > > cannot achieve it currently without doing what you propose. This means you need > > to include all the CSS, scripts, markup, images, whatever, that are necessary > > to demonstrate the problem. > > These test cases are not it. They do not show the rendering you would like, > they just do things that are currently invalid and claim that the result is > more interoperable than some hypothetical other rendering without explaining > what the rendering should be, what the browsers do now, etc. How can I show desired result using something that don't allow to achieve this desired result? The testcases shows exactly "the rendering I would like". If they currently are formally invalid, this does not make rendering wrong or unclear. What exactly don't you understand in the testcases (if any)? > Note that if your use case is "I want more styling control over <legend>", then > the right place to ask for that is the CSS working group. (And it's being > worked on already.) Quoting myself from comment 20: CSS currently cannot generate wrappers. On the contrary, we can easily add wrappers in HTML _right now_. So some potential fixing of CSS in some potential future is not an equivalent option. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 17:34:41 UTC