- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:58:17 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13096
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-12-02 20:58:16 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Partially Accepted
Change Description: none yet
Rationale: If your request is just to add a feature to manipulate a single
channel in hardware, then I am marking this bug LATER for now, so that we can
examine whether authors actually end up needing this enough to justify the new
feature. I suspect that in practice getImageData/putImageData is plenty fast
enough and would not be noticeably slower than a single-channel mechanism.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 20:58:19 UTC