- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:39:21 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12794
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |NEEDSINFO
--- Comment #7 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-12-02 00:39:19 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:
Why do authors need anything other than just regular markup? To take your
example:
<h1>A Clockwork Orange Trailer</h1>
<video src="file.mp4" poster="poster.png"></video>
<p><a href="file.mp4">Download the video file</a>.
<a href="transcript.html">Veiw the transcript</a>.</p>
(I don't see why anyone would care what the poster is.)
Can you point me to some existing sites to show how they handle this today?
e.g. how does YouTube handle this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 00:39:22 UTC