- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:58:57 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10853 --- Comment #2 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-09-30 18:58:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why is the <p> element not sufficient? > > Do you have a concrete page we could use to discuss this showing the problem in > question? (It can be an artificially simple page that just has the relevant > content, if you like.) I am sure that Gregory will also respond, but to me the relevant section in his bug report is the following: " 2. A method to reference a longer description of an image, without including the content in the main flow of a page. I'm assuming the text about being able to provide this in such a way that it's not visible to sighted users is also relevant. We did not deprecate longdesc, which has a two part aspect to it: discourage use AND provide an equivalent or superior approved technique. All we did is make it obsolete, leaving the functionality it provided unfulfilled. However, I think this is a duplicate of another bug? One that Laura filed? The following? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10455 It got assigned to Paul Cotton, so not sure what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 18:58:59 UTC